AI feels like all the rage lately. When does our company use it?
The determining factor comes down to labor costs over the short and long term, just like any other technology.
If you can describe a logo idea and have it ready for production in 5 minutes, why would you not? That's exactly how our company logo was built at its inception. Thought of the name, prompted for a logo, and it came out pretty good. It originally had a background, cropped that out and made it transparent, called it a day.
The past decade of Lean Startup thinking has had us in the Build-Measure-Learn loop, and building was done in 1-2 week iterations. Now we can pack logo creation into 5 minutes of that iteration and use the time for other things. We can pack days of website development into minutes as well. Great. We haven't even finished our morning coffee yet.
These tools are free for now, so it's extremely appealing. But how many tokens are we using? The cost is subsidized for now. There's a gold rush. What are the AI platforms getting out of it? Training for their models and testing. They're largely burning investor cash.
What happens if we build our business on the model of free tokens, and they dry up and we have to pay the cost? We are out of business and it's our fault for not taking the economics into account.
If a person outsources their thinking to AI it makes sense they'd not be able to imagine a solution to the AI takeover.
— iSpooge Daily with Harλan 📡 Media Tech R&D (@iSpoogeDaily) February 19, 2026
Outsource execution to AI and you'll never have a problem. You'll learn from it when it's available like any employee you hire, and figure it out if it's not.
As a mitigating measure, we use AI as loosely as possible in training or slow periods, and as much as possible on game days. We learn from the AI to the extent possible, and use it as similar as possible to human workers. Software mirrors the communication structure of the organization it exists within.
Rather than prompting big bang full stack solutions, we use our full stack expertise and prompt for concepts that we can rapidly learn from and incorporate into our products and services.
Venn Diagram: ( Agent ( Chat ( GPT / LLM / SLM ) ).
— iSpooge Daily with Harλan 📡 Media Tech R&D (@iSpoogeDaily) February 19, 2026
I've found value from AI up to the Chat level.
Yet to delve into Agents.
I don't claim they're hype, but I've not seen results like I have from Chat.
Business is relationships. Chat is an understandable interface.
We will also take client preferences into account. We find it hard to reasonably discriminate vs "100% hand crafted" or not, because we treat all code with the same care. We don't use Agents, we use Chat, like talking with a remote worker. We design with it and agree upon the specs, and then we have it implement those specs. LLMs are transformers, that means they transform clear specs into code exceptionally well.
There are some applications of AI that are sensitive and require guarantees like traceability. In those cases we can use Generative AI to crate a system that runs in a fashion that meets and applicable requirements such a regulations. The generated portion can be reviewed by a human, as though a contractor wrote it.
The most technical application of separating planning from execution.
— iSpooge Daily with Harλan 📡 Media Tech R&D (@iSpoogeDaily) February 26, 2026
We can make the plan, generate the expert system, validate it, and then it runs with traceability. https://t.co/ebnSGLEyvP
We don't insist upon AI use; we understand human factors like marketing promises. Some people have strong feelings against it, so if we sell a solution that is AI-free we'll ensure that's the case.
However you feel about AI, you can go ahead and Prompt a Human for a Custom IT Solution.